tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1639738090545138933.post6287219478378752412..comments2024-02-07T10:25:05.837-05:00Comments on Home Climate Analysis: Extreme GreenhouseKevan Hashemihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11014582378376549743noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1639738090545138933.post-78446117085205391872010-02-16T08:46:00.276-05:002010-02-16T08:46:00.276-05:00Dear Hugh, Yes, it's still a long way to go. B...Dear Hugh, Yes, it's still a long way to go. But I'm getting there in small steps. I think I have used conductivity correctly. What you are referring to is the "specific conductivity", which is a property of the material. The "conductivity" is a property of a particular object. Of course, in speech and often in writing, we abbreviate "specific conductivity" to "conductivity".Kevan Hashemihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11014582378376549743noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1639738090545138933.post-82561413453423711932010-02-16T04:37:35.623-05:002010-02-16T04:37:35.623-05:00Hi Kevan,
Interesting, although still a long way f...Hi Kevan,<br />Interesting, although still a long way from a rotating earth with night and day regimes.<br />You have (thermal) conductivity as W/Km2; should it not be W/Km (or Wm-1K-1)? <br />HughAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12189828153507564586noreply@blogger.com